One important limitation of relying too heavily on secondary sources in literature reviews is that they may not always be up-to-date. This is especially true in fields such as medicine and science, where new research is constantly being published. Additionally, secondary sources may not always be reliable – they may be biased, outdated, or just plain wrong. Finally, using too many secondary sources can make your literature review seem like a regurgitation of other people’s work, rather than a thoughtful and original piece of writing.

Other related questions:

What are the limitations of a literature review?

There are several potential limitations to consider when conducting a literature review. First, the quality of the studies included in the review may be variable, which can impact the overall findings. Second, the review may be biased if the selection of studies is not systematic. Finally, the conclusions of the review may be limited by the availability of data, which can lead to cherry-picking of studies.

What is secondary source in literature review?

A secondary source is a source that provides information that has been previously published. This can include books, journal articles, websites, etc.

How are secondary sources valuable in literature review?

Secondary sources can be valuable in a literature review as they provide a different perspective on the research topic. They can also add depth and context to the review.

What is a secondary source for a research literature review quizlet?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it will depend on the focus of your particular literature review. However, some possible secondary sources that could be used in a research literature review include scholarly journal articles, books, and other academic sources.


  • Was this Helpful ?
  • YesNo

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *